Attorneys

Scott K. Reed Partner, New York

Professional Experience

Scott K. Reed is the Chairman of the firm’s Litigation Practice Group.

His practice focuses on the trial and appeal of complex patent litigations for technology leaders including Bristol Myers Squibb, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Emory University, Bausch & Lomb, DuPont, Mitsui, Union Carbide, Quebec Metal Powders, Canon, and IBM.

Mr. Reed has extensive trial experience and has served as lead trial counsel in cases involving pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, chemicals and electronic and computer technologies.

His patent litigations include representing: 

  • Bristol-Myers Squibb in Regents of the University of Michigan and Repligen Corporation v. Bristol-Myers Squibb (fusion protein regulation of the immune system), Housey Pharmaceuticals v. Bristol-Myers Squibb (cell based biotechnology assays), Zymogenetics v. Bristol-Myers Squibb (fusion proteins) and Regents of the University of Michigan and Repligen Corporation v. Bristol-Myers (rheumatoid arthritis pharmaceuticals)

  • Genzyme in Bonecare and Genzyme v. Pentech, Eagle, Sandoz, Anchen, and Roxanne (kidney disease pharmaceuticals); Bonecare and Genzyme v. Impax, Lupin, Endo, Teva, Watson, and Sandoz (kidney disease pharmaceuticals); Daiichi-Sankyo and Genzyme v. Impax and Lupin (anti-cholesterol pharmaceuticals). 

  • GlaxoSmithKline in GlaxoSmithKline v. Barr  (prostate pharmaceuticals); Pozen v. Par (migrane pharmaceuticals)

  • Merck in Merck v. Alcon (anti-glaucoma pharmaceuticals)

  • Novartis in Novartis v. Abbott (organ transplant cyclosporin pharmaceuticals) 

  • Pfizer in Pfizer v. Barr (estrogen contraceptive pharmaceuticals) and Pfizer v. Barr (hormone replacement therapy pharmaceuticals)

  • UCB v. Mylan, UCB v. Dr. Reddy’s, UCB v. Ivax, UCB v. Sandoz and UCB v. Cobalt (epilepsy pharmaceuticals); UCB v. KV (attention deficit disorder pharmaceuticals)

  • Emory University in Emory University v. Glaxo Wellcome (anti-hepatitis pharmaceuticals) and Emory University v. Glaxo Wellcome and BioChem Pharma (anti-AIDS pharmaceuticals)

  • Bausch & Lomb in Bausch & Lomb v. Alcon and Bausch & Lomb v. Allergan (contact lens care products containing proteolytic enzymes and antimicrobial agents), Visx v. Bausch & Lomb (laser eye surgery), Allergan v. Bausch & Lomb (intraocular lenses), Allergan v. Bausch & Lomb (anti-glaucoma pharmaceuticals), Bausch & Lomb v. GNC, Bausch & Lomb v. Leiner, Bausch & Lomb v. Alcon, and Bausch & Lomb v. Rexall (nutritional supplement to treat Macular Degeneration)

  • DuPont in Schneider v. DuPont and DuPont v. Cordis (polymeric balloon angioplasty materials)

  • Mitsui in 3M v. Mitsui (adhesive technology)

  • Union Carbide in BP v. Union Carbide (polyethylene processing technology)

  • Quebec Metal Powders in Hoeganaes v. Quebec Metal Powders (powder metallurgy)

  • Canon in Honeywell v. Canon (autofocus camera technology) and Gross v. Canon (microprocessor technology and optical devices)

  • IBM in Berkeley v. IBM (personal computers); Valutron v. IBM (point of sale devices)

Mr. Reed also presently serves on the firm’s Management Committee.

Awards and Recognition

Scott K. Reed was listed in Legal 500 2007-2009 in Patent Litigation and in Legal Media Group Guide to the World’s Leading Patent Law Practitioners 2007-2009.

For information on the selection process, see:

http://www.legal500.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=772&Itemid=1

Education

J.D., Franklin Pierce Law Center, 1987, Editorial Board (IDEA) Journal of Law and Technology
B.S. Chemistry & Economics (double major), Ursinus College, 1984

Bar Admissions

State of New York, 1988; U.S. District Courts for the Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of New York; U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Professional Activities

American Bar Association; American Intellectual Property Law Association; Federal Bar Counsel; Federal Circuit Bar Association; New York Intellectual Property Law Association

Related Information

Representative Cases

UCB Societe Anonyme & UCB Pharma Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc. et al
N.D. GA 2006
The Regents of the University of Michigan and Repligen Corp. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb
Fed. Cir. 2004
Housey Pharmaceuticals v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Fed. Cir. 2004
The Regents of the University of Michigan and Repligen Corp. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
E.D. Mich. 2003
Allergan v. Bausch & Lomb and Alcon
C.D. Cal., 2002
Housey Pharmaceuticals v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
D.Del 2002
Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
W.D.N.Y. 1999

Events

5th Annual Pharmaceutical & Biotech Patent Litigation Strategies Conference
IQPC
May 24-26th, 2010
Key Factors in Long-Term Lawyer-Client Relationships
AIPLA 2008 Mid-Winter Institute
January 24, 2008
Latest Legislative and Judicial Updates Impacting US Pharma Industry
5th Annual Pharmaceutical Patent Life Cycles Conference
January 20, 2006
Claim Construction
NYIPLA/Federal Circuit Bar Association Conference
October 14, 2005
What Every IP Lawyer Should Know About How to Conduct a Trial in the Digital Decade
American Intellectual Property Law Association’s 2004 Mid-Winter Institute
January 28-31, 2004
Practical Tips for Jury Trials in Patent Cases
2004 AIPLA Mid-Winter Institute
January 2004
Exclusivity: Who Can Stay and Who Can Play
Legal Strategies for Maximizing Pharmaceutical Patent Life Cycles Conference
April 1, 2003

In The News

Fitzpatrick #1 in NY For Initiating Patent Litigation
IP Worldwide
May 2002